Back to profile

The Missing Layer in Manufacturing - And Why Robots Changed How I Think About It

In my last post, I wrote about SMT manufacturing, EMCs, and why India's electronics push made me rethink how physical products are built.

At the time, I thought I was chasing a manufacturing question. I wasn't. I was circling something bigger - how decisions turn into physical action, and why that loop is still mostly manual. That's where robots enter the picture.

The Moment It Clicked: Intelligence Without Agency Is Incomplete

Somewhere between talking about SMT lines, EMC incentives, and failure feedback loops, I hit a wall. I kept thinking: Okay, suppose we capture all this manufacturing intelligence. Then what? Who acts on it?

Today, the answer is a human engineer, a technician, a checklist, a late-night debug session. That works. But it doesn't scale.

That's when I realized something uncomfortable: we've built intelligence systems for the physical world, but we haven't given them bodies.

Robots Are Not Just Machines. They Are Actors.

When people hear "robot automation," they imagine robotic arms, conveyor belts, pick-and-place machines. But the more I thought about it, the more I saw robots differently.

• A decision executor
• A repeatable actor
• A physical API

It takes "this should be done" and turns it into "this is done." Without that layer, intelligence stays theoretical.

Why SMT Lines Were My First Clue

SMT manufacturing is already one of the most robotic environments we have. Pick-and-place machines read placement files, execute micron-level movements, and repeat perfectly. AOI systems see, compare, and flag anomalies.

But here's the catch: these machines don't really know why they're doing what they're doing. They execute instructions. They don't learn across products. They don't adapt across factories. They don't reason. Each SMT line is an island.

The Missing Connection: Robots + Memory + Feedback

This is where everything ties together. Let me say it plainly: an Operating System for the Physical World without robots is just a knowledge base. Robots without an operating system are just tools. The power is in the loop.

Sense - Decide - Act - Observe - Learn

• Vision systems see misalignment
• OSPW understands why it matters
• Robots correct or flag
• Results feed back into design and process rules

That loop barely exists today.

This Is Bigger Than Factories (This Is Where Repair Comes In)

Here is where my thinking moved beyond SMT. Once you see robots as agents, not machines, manufacturing is just one environment. The same system applies to device repair, inspection, rework, recycling, and field servicing.

A broken device is just a failed state in the physical system. Instead of manuals, guesswork, and human-only diagnosis, you have vision, structured failure memory, robotic assistance, and guided or autonomous repair.

That's when "Operating System for the Physical World" stopped being about factories alone.

Why India Makes This Even More Interesting

India has massive human-in-the-loop operations, increasing automation, cost pressure, repair-heavy ecosystems, and growing manufacturing. That creates a rare environment where humans and robots must work together, full automation is not always the goal, and assisted autonomy is valuable.

This is where robotics actually fits - not replacing people, but augmenting physical workflows.

So What Does This System Actually Look Like?

Not sci-fi. Not humanoids everywhere. More like:

• Vision systems that identify anomalies
• Robots that handle repetitive precision tasks
• Humans making judgment calls
• OSPW coordinating who does what, when

Think CI/CD - but for physical actions.

The Roadmap (Now With Robots)

1. Capture physical failures: AOI data, vision anomalies, repair logs, human interventions
2. Encode actionable rules: "If misalignment > X, do Y"
3. Robotic assistance: automated rework, guided repair, inspection bots, mobile factory helpers
4. Autonomous loops (where it makes sense): self-correcting processes, adaptive test coverage

The Big Shift: From Automation to Agency

This is the line I eventually landed on: automation repeats. Agency decides. Robots give the physical world agency. OSPW gives that agency context. Together, they close the loop.

Why This Isn't Happening Yet

Because it sits at an awkward intersection: hardware, software, robotics, manufacturing, human workflows. No single industry owns it, which also means it's wide open.

Closing Thought

The future factory is not fully automated. And it isn't fully human. It's coordinated. And coordination requires memory, intelligence, and agency. That's what I mean when I talk about an Operating System for the Physical World - and why robots aren't an add-on, but a core part of the story.